PGMOL has finally released the VAR audio for Manchester United not given a penalty after a Handball in the die minutes against Totheham VIDEO] – Reasons for not given a penalty. VIDEO | The VAR Audio is out and it’s one of the worst things I’ve ever listened to.

The Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL) recently shared the VAR audio from a contentious moment during the Manchester United vs. Tottenham match. The focus was on a potential handball by a Spurs defender, which was not ruled a penalty. This decision has ignited discussions among fans and football analysts.

In the closing moments of the game, a Manchester United player’s shot hit the arm of a Tottenham defender. The VAR team reviewed the incident, and the audio release offers insight into their rationale. Here are the key points:

1. **Handball Rule Interpretation**: The VAR team examined whether the handball met the criteria for a penalty. According to the current rules, a handball offense occurs only when a player’s arm is in an unnatural position or when they intentionally handle the ball. The officials determined that the defender’s arm was in a natural position in relation to their body movement.

2. **Position of the Defender**: The VAR audio revealed that the officials closely analyzed the defender’s body position at the time of the handball. They concluded that the defender’s arm was close to their body, which influenced their decision.

3. **Shot’s Speed and Angle**: The speed and angle of the shot were also considered. The VAR team noted that the defender had minimal reaction time, implying that the handball was not deliberate, which is key in making such decisions.

4. **On-field Referee’s Decision**: The original decision by the on-field referee played a significant part. VAR can only overrule a call if there is a “clear and obvious error.” In this case, the VAR team decided that the referee’s choice not to give a penalty did not meet that threshold.

5. **Consistency and Precedent**: The audio highlighted the importance of consistency in officiating, ensuring this decision aligned with similar rulings from other matches throughout the season.

This release of VAR audio is part of PGMOL’s effort to provide more transparency in critical officiating moments. Although the explanation provides insight into the decision-making process, many fans and pundits remain dissatisfied, believing a penalty should have been awarded.